Welcome to tPB!

Please either login or register for an account to access the forums.

  • Welcome to The Platinum Board! We are a Nebraska Cornhuskers news source and community. Please click "Log In" or "Register" above to gain access to the forums.

Should Reggie Bush get his Heisman back? (1 Viewer)

Yes or no

  • Yes

    Votes: 38 70.4%
  • No

    Votes: 16 29.6%

  • Total voters
    54

huskermack

Offensive
Elite Member
tPB OG
Messages
2,098
Likes
7,441
The definition of "cheat" is "to act unfairly or dishonestly in order to gain an advantage, especially in a game or examination."

As far as I know, Reggie Bush didn't do anything to gain an advantage competitively, so I'm curious what you mean by this. Did he break NCAA rules at the time? Yes. Did he cheat to win his Heisman or gain a competitive advantage on the football field? No. In fact, according to the definition, I don't think he "cheated" at all.
I say it’s cheating and I always have and will.
I’m in a meeting right now so bear with me a bit…

He was getting paid to play. That’s cheating.
What if they didn’t provide him the advantages and another team did off the bat? Would that lure him elsewhere? Probably.

You can say it’s not related to performance, but it is as it relates to team performance. .
 

DrumMonkeyRobot

Cornerback
Elite Member
Messages
560
Likes
2,292
I say it’s cheating and I always have and will.
I’m in a meeting right now so bear with me a bit…

He was getting paid to play. That’s cheating.
What if they didn’t provide him the advantages and another team did off the bat? Would that lure him elsewhere? Probably.

You can say it’s not related to performance, but it is as it relates to team performance. .
USC and/or boosters aren't who paid him. It was two agents who wanted to represent him when he went pro. So no, USC didn't cheat to get him, they didn't pay him to play for them, and therefore, the money he took had nothing to do with the USC team or his being there. Hence, not cheating.
 

huskermack

Offensive
Elite Member
tPB OG
Messages
2,098
Likes
7,441
USC and/or boosters aren't who paid him. It was two agents who wanted to represent him when he went pro. So no, USC didn't cheat to get him, they didn't pay him to play for them, and therefore, the money he took had nothing to do with the USC team or his being there. Hence, not cheating.
Shows what I know. Ha.

So call it something else I guess.
He broke rules and lost his heisman because of it. Were the new rules retroactively applied in their wording?

I don’t think I’ll ever think he deserves it back.
 

iruletheskool

Wide Receiver
Moderator
Elite Member
tPB OG
Messages
2,341
Likes
6,930
Hey guys this thing that happened definitely totally didnt happen
 

Log in or sign up to benefit more from the forum!

Log in or register to benefit more from the forum!

Register

Creating an account on the forum is completely free.

Register now
Log in

If you have an account, please log in

Log in

Users who are viewing this thread

Theme editor

Theme customizations

Graphic backgrounds

Granite backgrounds